Large-scale energy users in Ontario can spend hundreds of thousands of dollars each year on Ontario Global Adjustment charges, often without a clear understanding of what drives these costs or why they change so much from year to year. If you oversee production, energy procurement, or cost management at a commercial or industrial facility, you’ve likely felt this impact directly.

This article breaks down what GA is, how it’s calculated for Class A and Class B customers, why rates have been unusually volatile, and what our analysts expect for GA costs through 2030 and beyond.

What Is Global Adjustment in Ontario?

Ontario’s Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO), the agency that administers the wholesale electricity market and manages grid infrastructure, applies two major components to electricity rates: energy cost and Global Adjustment. How that energy cost is billed depends on the customer.

Residential and small business accounts pay a regulated energy price, either time-of-use or tiered pricing, set by the Ontario Energy Board. Interval-metered medium and large businesses instead pay the Ontario Electricity Market Price (Ontario Price), the actual wholesale price of electricity, as its own line item. GA is layered on top of either pricing structure, and it allows the grid operator to recover capital costs for energy generation: the investments required to build and maintain nuclear, hydro, solar, biomass, and gas generation, and to deliver energy services to the grid. It’s also important to note that electricity prices and GA are inversely related.

Ontario introduced Global Adjustment in 2006, with the added in 2011. The ICI was introduced as a demand response program to encourage the province’s largest energy users to curtail their electricity demand during the province’s top 5 coincident peak events 鈥� the 5 hours each year where the Ontario grid is at peak demand.

The goal of these programs was to repay major infrastructure investments across the province while promoting demand-side management among large energy users.

GA has created ongoing confusion for customers, particularly in commercial and industrial markets where it contributes significantly to overall electricity costs. The term itself reveals little about what the line item actually represents. It’s also worth noting that GA applies only to large-scale energy users. 91影视s, farms, and small- to medium-sized businesses generally don’t see it broken out as a separate charge. For these customers, GA is baked directly into standard electricity rates.

Some of this confusion has been compounded by Ontario’s , which went live on May 1, 2025, and represents the most significant overhaul of Ontario’s electricity market since deregulation. MRP was the replacement of the old province-wide Hourly Ontario Energy Price (HOEP) with a nodal pricing system, Locational Marginal Prices (LMPs), and introduced a formal day-ahead market, changes designed to better reflect local congestion and generation costs across the grid.

What MRP did not change is Global Adjustment itself: GA remains a separate charge, layered on top of the new nodal energy pricing, using the same underlying cost-recovery logic described above. In other words, the way Ontario prices energy changed substantially in 2025; the way it recovers generation investment costs through GA did not. If you’re interested in learning more, check out our guide to Market Renewal Program for Class A customers.

Several components make up total GA costs, including new infrastructure built to complement Ontario’s large-scale generating facilities, :

• 3 nuclear power plants
• 6 gas generating stations
• 5 hydropower facilities
• 14 transmission-connected solar projects
• 1 large biomass facility

Maintenance and upgrades to existing resources, including recent and ongoing refurbishment work at all three nuclear power plants, also factor into GA. So do the province’s conservation programs, which help commercial and industrial energy users retrofit facilities to reduce consumption.

How Global Adjustment Costs Are Calculated: Class A vs. Class B

Every Ontario electricity customer pays GA, but how that cost is allocated depends on billing classification under the Industrial Conservation Initiative (ICI). Eligibility is tiered by average monthly peak demand:

Businesses that qualify but aren’t automatically enrolled must opt in, and large consumers who’d prefer Class B must opt out, by June 15 each year, based on the prior 12-month (May鈥揂pril) base period.

Class A customers pay their share of GA based on their Peak Demand Factor (PDF): their consumption during Ontario’s five highest system-wide demand hours of the year, divided by the province-wide total consumption across those same five hours. For example, if a facility consumed a combined 20.015 MWh across the year’s top five peak hours, and Ontario’s system-wide consumption across those same five hours totaled 117,875.695 MWh, that facility’s PDF would be roughly 0.00017 (0.017%), and it would be billed that same percentage of the total monthly Class A GA cost pool. The IESO publishes the year’s top five peaks and system-wide totals after the base period closes, so a facility’s exact PDF isn’t confirmed until the following adjustment period begins.

Class B customers, facilities that don’t participate in the ICI, which is most medium-sized businesses, pay GA by multiplying their total monthly consumption (MWh) by the Class B GA rate published on the IESO website for that month. The IESO actually publishes three variations of this rate each month (a 1st estimate, a 2nd estimate, and a final actual rate) to accommodate different utility billing cycles. If the rate on your bill doesn’t match the rate published on IESO’s website, that’s usually why. Your utility can confirm which variation they use.

This distinction creates very different incentives. Class A customers are effectively rewarded for reducing consumption during anticipated system peak hours, a strategy commonly known as peak shaving. Class B customers are billed on total usage regardless of timing, so they have comparatively little incentive to manage when they consume electricity.

It’s worth understanding the timing here, since Class A billing runs on a lag. GA calculations, and eligibility, for Class A customers are built on :

• Base period (peak-setting period): May 1 鈥� April 30. This is when a customer’s consumption is measured to determine ICI eligibility and to calculate their Peak Demand Factor against Ontario’s five highest system-wide demand hours.
• Adjustment period (billing period): July 1 鈥� June 30 of the following year. This is when the resulting PDF is actually applied to monthly GA charges.

In other words, a facility’s peak demand behavior this year won’t show up on its GA bill until roughly 14 months later 鈥� which is exactly why forecasting Ontario’s system peaks before they happen matters more than reacting to them after the fact.

For facilities that qualify, opting into Class A and actively managing peak demand is one of the most direct levers available to control GA exposure. It can be far easier to manage demand during 5 hours, as opposed to all hours during the month, though it requires accurately forecasting when Ontario’s peaks will occur, since misjudging even one of the five hours can meaningfully change a facility’s PDF for the year. Businesses should review their energy profile and ICI eligibility annually, ahead of the June 15 deadline, to confirm they’re on the most cost-effective option. See for full criteria.

Why Global Adjustment Rates Have Been Unsteady

Even once you understand how your facility’s peak consumption feeds into GA, forecasting actual GA costs remains difficult. That’s because GA isn’t only a cost-recovery mechanism for the grid operator, it also functions as a flexible tool to manage volatility in the wholesale electricity market. Price volatility is bad for businesses and for the broader economy. It increases financial risk and drives up operating expenses.

That’s effectively what happened in late 2025 and early 2026. GA and market price move inversely by design: many of Ontario’s generators are guaranteed a set contracted or regulated rate, so when the wholesale market price sits below that rate, GA rises to cover the shortfall, and when it rises above that rate, the relationship flips. In early 2026, wholesale prices climbed high enough to exceed the contracted rate for many generators, who had to return the difference. That surplus flowed back to customers through GA, pushing rates into negative territory rather than adding a charge. GA also shifts with system conditions and with changes to generator contracts and conservation programs. Several factors contributed to this dynamic:

• A capacity shortfall at the Pickering Nuclear Generating Station, where aging reactors are being taken out of service while refurbishment work continues for the next several years.
• Unseasonably cold winter weather, which drove up electricity demand and wholesale prices, requiring a larger GA offset.
• Regional grid interdependency, when neighboring markets in the northeast face their own supply shortfalls during severe cold, they draw on Ontario’s grid, further tightening the wholesale market.
• Increased reliance on flexible gas generation to fill supply gaps, typically at a higher marginal cost.

Graph source:

As a result of these pressures, GA rates trended downward through late 2025 and into early 2026. In December 2025, GA rates moved into , meaning large energy users saw ratepayer credits reducing their bills rather than an added charge. This negative pricing period ended as winter turned to spring. Current and historical GA rates are published monthly on .

It’s worth noting, however, that GA’s recent dip isn’t purely a market phenomenon; it’s partly due to subsidy timing. Since 2021, Ontario’s Renewable Cost Shift program has shifted a portion of the above-market costs of roughly 33,000 legacy renewable energy contracts from electricity bills to the general provincial tax base. As of 2025, this is still delivering an average 14% bill reduction for industrial (Class A) customers and 11% for medium-sized commercial customers, per Ontario’s own Energy for Generations plan. However, the province’s Financial Accountability Office projects this discount will shrink gradually over the next two decades as the underlying legacy contracts expire.

Combined with a growing share of new generation being procured through availability-based contracts (which get paid regardless of whether they’re dispatched, and are recovered entirely through GA), the underlying trend in total electricity costs has been upward over the past several years, even in periods when the GA line item alone looked flat or falling.

Why Global Adjustment Costs are Expected to Rise

Reduced GA rates are unlikely to last. 91影视’s energy markets team, drawing on IESO capacity planning data and current power purchase agreement (PPA) timelines, forecasts that GA rates will climb over the next several years 鈥� potentially returning to historical highs in the range of several hundred thousand dollars per megawatt-year, a level last seen during a prior peak in Ontario’s generation contracting cycle.

The market drivers behind this outlook are well known in the industry:

• Expiring supply contracts. Several gigawatts of generation capacity operate under power purchase agreements set to expire in 2029, including the 2.1 GW gas-fired Lennox Generating Station. Renewing or replacing this capacity will likely mean new contracts priced to reflect current construction, fuel, and operating costs, all of which flow into GA.
• Rising demand. The IESO’s long-term outlook projects Ontario’s net annual energy demand growing from roughly 152 terawatt-hours (TWh) today to approximately 250 TWh by 2050, driven by electrification, industrial expansion, data center growth, and population increases. This will require the build out of much more energy supplies in the province.
• Nuclear refurbishment and new build costs. Ontario is investing in small modular reactors (SMRs) at the Darlington Nuclear Generating Station, with current cost estimates around CAD 21 billion. As a first-of-its-kind deployment in Canada, that estimate carries meaningful uncertainty and could increase. Once online, recovery of these costs will likely flow through GA.
• Natural gas price exposure. Wholesale gas prices, a key input for Ontario’s gas-fired generation, remain sensitive to global supply disruptions. Global instability reflected by the Russia-Ukraine war and chokepoint at the Strait of Hormuz can disrupt gas supplies at any time. Gas prices are also affected by extreme weather, production and infrastructure constraints, and more.

The trendlines are clear. Electricity demand is expected to rise for many years to come, and Ontario is committed to procuring electricity that could add sizable cost recovery to GA rates. The graph below prepared by our markets team and supported by an independent third party, shows projected GA costs to rise to nearly $900/MW by 2044

听

How Businesses Can Reduce Global Adjustment Exposure

No matter how Ontario manages GA rates, the realities of grid modernization remain the same. Aging grid infrastructure will continue to get older, demand will continue to rise as we fully enter the AI age, and the need for better flexibility and grid utilization will continue to grow. Facilities that build in flexibility now will be better positioned as GA costs rise.

Behind-the-Meter (BTM) battery energy storage is one of the most direct tools available. Facilities that integrate distributed energy resources, particularly battery storage, can respond more quickly to changing electricity prices and grid conditions. Battery systems, paired with leading grid event forecasting, can be configured to automatically offset grid demand during a GA event, discharging stored energy instead of drawing from the grid during a forecasted GA event.

Timing matters here. Most energy infrastructure projects, including new generation, major retrofits, or interconnection upgrades, can stretch project timelines to seven years or more. BTM battery storage projects, by comparison, can typically be completed in 12 to 18 months, making them one of the fastest available responses to rising energy costs.

It’s also worth remembering that GA rates for Class A customers are determined using the prior year’s peak demand contribution. That means the value of any peak-management strategy 鈥� battery storage, curtailment planning, or demand forecasting 鈥� shows up on future bills, not immediately. Facilities aiming to control GA exposure in 2029, for example, should plan to have energy storage or demand-management systems in place well before then, since the base period used to calculate that year’s GA rate closes out roughly a year in advance.

Even during periods when GA rates are low or negative, as seen in early 2026, the businesses best positioned for the next rate cycle are the ones that keep investing in demand flexibility now rather than waiting for costs to climb again.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Global Adjustment (GA) in Ontario? Global Adjustment is a charge applied to every Ontario electricity customer’s bill, covering the difference between the wholesale market price of electricity and the actual cost of contracted, regulated, and conservation-related generation resources across the province. It’s administered by the IESO. How it’s calculated, and whether it appears as its own line item on your utility bill, depends on your billing classification.

What’s the difference between Class A and Class B customers? Class A customers are large facilities that opt into the Industrial Conservation Initiative. This includes manufacturing and industrial businesses with average monthly peak demand between 500 kW and 1 MW, other medium consumers between 1 MW and 5 MW, and large consumers above 5 MW (who are automatically enrolled). They pay GA based on their contribution to Ontario’s five highest system-wide demand hours each year. Class B customers pay GA based on total monthly electricity consumption.

When do businesses need to opt in or out of Class A? Eligible medium-sized businesses that want to opt into Class A, and large consumers (above 5 MW) who’d prefer to opt out of their automatic Class A enrollment, must do so by June 15 each year. Eligibility is based on average monthly peak demand during the prior 12-month base period (May 1 to April 30).

Why did Ontario’s GA rate go negative in January 2026? Rising wholesale electricity prices driven by factors including a Pickering Nuclear Generating Station capacity shortfall, unseasonably cold weather, and regional grid demand, temporarily resulting in ratepayer credits rather than added charges.

Why are GA rates expected to rise in the coming years? Several gigawatts of generation contracts are set to expire in 2029, Ontario’s electricity demand is projected to grow substantially through 2050, and major nuclear investments (including new SMRs at Darlington) will eventually require cost recovery, all of which are expected to push GA rates higher.

Did Ontario’s Market Renewal Program change Global Adjustment? No. The Market Renewal Program (MRP), which launched May 1, 2025, overhauled how Ontario prices energy, replacing the province-wide HOEP with nodal Locational Marginal Pricing and a formal day-ahead market. Global Adjustment was not part of this reform and continues to be charged separately, using the same cost-recovery structure it always has.

How can businesses reduce their Global Adjustment costs? Class A-eligible facilities can actively manage consumption during anticipated system peak hours to lower their Peak Demand Factor. On-site battery energy storage is one of the most effective tools for this, since it can offset grid draw during GA events and can typically be deployed in 12鈥�18 months. See our peak demand forecasting and battery storage solutions for more detail.

The post Ontario Global Adjustment Costs: What鈥檚 Driving GA Rates in 2026 and Beyond first appeared on 91影视.

WHAT DOES LEADERSHIP LOOK LIKE IN A SECTOR THAT IS TECHNICAL, CAPITAL-INTENSIVE, AND RAPIDLY TRANSFORMING?听

Megan Davis:听In a sector that is technical, capital-intensive, and rapidly evolving, leadership means听remaining听continuously adaptable. The landscape is shifting quickly 鈥� from regulatory frameworks to market signals to technological capabilities 鈥� and static leadership simply听doesn鈥檛听work in that environment.听

To me, strong leadership in this space requires the ability to reassess assumptions, pivot when necessary, and stay open to听new information.听It鈥檚听about balancing conviction with flexibility. You need听a clear vision, but you also need the humility to adjust course as conditions change.听

Because the grid and energy markets are transforming in real time, the leaders who will be most effective are those who can evolve alongside the industry鈥攏ot resist it.听

Jayamali听Kasige:听Leadership in the energy sector today requires navigating a fundamental shift. From conventional generation to renewables, storage, and digitalization. It鈥檚 not just about managing change; it鈥檚 about understanding the technical realities behind that transformation.听

In highly technical, capital-intensive environments, leaders need credibility with engineers and project teams. They must understand engineering constraints, system reliability, and safety; not at a surface level, but in a way that builds trust. At the same time, they must think commercially and strategically.听

Strong energy leaders need to translate technical complexity into financial and long-term strategic outcomes. They bridge engineering and business, ensuring that innovation is practical, reliable, and economically sound.听听

Kathryn Weber:听Leadership in a sector that鈥檚 technical, capital-intensive, and rapidly transforming needs to balance vision with coordination. It starts with reading the signals 鈥� understanding where the industry is headed, what timing matters, and which decisions need to be made before the window closes. Just as important is the ability to rally and align teams around a clear mission and purpose, especially when the work is complex and long-term.听

It also needs to be deeply collaborative. Energy and infrastructure bring together a wide range of听expertise听鈥� across technical domains, commercial realities, policy, and operations 鈥� and the industry is full of interdependencies between teams, functions, and stakeholders. Strong leaders create the conditions for that collaboration: they connect dots across disciplines, build shared context, and bring people together to solve the problem, not just execute a plan.听

Finally, effective leadership in this space leans into the team’s strengths and values the diversity within it. Because the work requires such a broad mix of skill sets and perspectives, the best leaders foster an inclusive culture where people feel heard, respected, and able to contribute fully. They make space for different viewpoints, draw out expertise, and ensure those voices shape the decisions. I see those qualities reflected in the leadership team every day at 91影视.听

Barbara Rosado:听In a sector that is highly technical and rapidly transforming,听it鈥檚听important to remember that we are still talking about people. Markets evolve quickly 鈥� with new regulations, technologies, and operating models 鈥� but the people working within them are evolving too. Change takes time to study, understand, and implement effectively.听

To me, leadership means recognizing that gap between transformation and human adaptation. A strong leader听identifies听where support is needed and creates the conditions for their team to succeed. That might mean providing clarity when regulations shift, helping听prioritize in听moments of complexity, or simply ensuring that learning is part of the process.听

It also requires understanding that people work differently. Some need structured check-ins and frequent alignment; others perform best with autonomy and space. Leadership is not one-size-fits-all.听It鈥檚听about balancing individual needs with team听objectives, while keeping everyone aligned around a common goal.听

In a capital-intensive and fast-moving industry, human awareness is essential.听听

A BELIEF ABOUT LEADERSHIP THAT HAS EVOLVED FOR YOU:听

Barbara Rosado:听I used to believe that a leader had to be intimidating; someone who questioned everything, pushed constantly, and led through pressure. For a long time, I thought that intensity was the standard.听

That belief changed when I encountered leaders who welcomed me as I am. They still challenged me and gave me space to grow, while also valuing the perspectives I brought to the table. That made me feel capable and useful, not small.听

I鈥檝e come to believe that when leaders nurture that feeling in others, they don鈥檛 just drive performance, they build strong, confident teams.听

WHAT SKILLS OR MINDSETS WILL MATTER MOST FOR GRID MODERNIZATION LEADERSHIP?听

Megan Davis:听I believe a commitment to continuous learning will be one of the most important mindsets for the next听generation听shaping the future grid. The energy sector 鈥� along with the technologies and software that support it 鈥� is evolving rapidly. Staying effective requires an ongoing investment in understanding both market dynamics and emerging tools.听

To remain impactful, we need to move as quickly as the industry does. That can be challenging, particularly in a complex, high-stakes space. Maintaining stability and confidence while also remaining humble and adaptable is essential.听

The leaders and contributors who are successfully leading grid modernization are those who recognize that expertise isn鈥檛 static. It鈥檚 built through continuous education, curiosity, and a willingness to evolve alongside the systems we鈥檙e working to improve.听

Jayamali听Kasige:听The future grid will require an expanded mix of skills and mindsets beyond those traditionally associated with the power sector.听It鈥檚听not about replacing foundational engineering听expertise, but听adding new capabilities 鈥� particularly in digital systems and cross-functional collaboration.听

The grid is evolving from a centralized and predictable system into a digital, decentralized, and highly dynamic platform. Managing that complexity will require leaders and professionals who can听operate听across multiple domains.听

Those shaping the future grid will need strengths in engineering, digital technologies, market structures, and collaboration. The ability to connect technical knowledge with data, policy, and commercial realities will be essential to building a resilient and adaptive energy system.听

Leigh Billinghurst: Without hesitation, AI. But, more broadly, curiosity and continuous growth.听

The next generation of leaders in grid modernization must embrace AI, not resist it. We鈥檙e operating in a world where unprecedented amounts of data are available at our fingertips. The differentiator is no longer access to information 鈥� it鈥檚 how effectively we receive, interpret, and leverage it. The right tools allow us to focus less on searching for data and more on managing it, extracting insights, and acting on them.听

When used well, AI removes some of the administrative burden and creates space for higher-value thinking. It enables us to challenge assumptions, synthesize trends, and focus on solving industry challenges听we鈥檙e听facing for the first time. That shift allows leaders to be more forward-looking instead of reactive.听

But it鈥檚 not just about AI itself. It鈥檚 about being deeply curious. Asking better questions, investing in your own development, and continuously growing alongside your team and the industry. There are more ways than ever to acquire information, which can feel overwhelming. The leaders who thrive will be the ones who stay intentional, adaptable, and committed to growth.听

WHAT ADVICE WOULD YOU GIVE SOMEONE CONSIDERING A CAREER IN ENERGY, CLIMATE, OR INFRASTRUCTURE?听

Leigh Billinghurst:听My advice is simple: get curious and get involved.听

There are countless events hosted by passionate people across听the energy听and climate space. Attend them. Meet people. Ask questions. Learn about the different paths this industry offers.听It鈥檚听a sector filled with individuals who genuinely care about solving meaningful problems.听

If you鈥檙e motivated by tackling challenges that haven鈥檛 been solved before, problems that evolve daily and demand innovative thinking, this is the right industry for you. It fuels curiosity, growth, and a comfort with complexity. For me, what began as a desire to work in dynamic, fast-moving environments has evolved into something deeper: a passion for contributing to solutions that matter.听

Grid strain, rising energy costs, and political barriers aren鈥檛 going away; they鈥檙e becoming more complex. That鈥檚 exactly why we need smart, capable, and committed people entering this space.听

Find where your skill set can have the greatest impact. Stay curious. Invest in relationships. The opportunity to make a difference here is real.听

Kathryn Weber:听Cannonball in! You won鈥檛 regret it. It鈥檚 a fast-growing space filled with people who are genuinely passionate about solving tough problems. If you鈥檙e looking for work you can tie to real-world impact, it鈥檚 hard to beat the feeling of contributing to systems that enable the energy transition.听

Be curious. The sector is constantly evolving 鈥� technologies shift, policy and market structures change, and the challenges are rarely static. Ask questions, stay open, and听don鈥檛听be intimidated by what you听don鈥檛听know at the start (especially in an industry full of acronyms!); the learning curve is part of what makes the work interesting.听

It also helps to get clear on what sparks your excitement. 鈥淓nergy,鈥� 鈥渋nfrastructure,鈥� and 鈥渃limate鈥� are broad umbrellas, so take time to understand which areas align most with your interests and strengths, and where you can apply your skills and experience.听

Finally, lean into the community as you explore your interests.听It鈥檚听a welcoming space, and there are lots of ways to connect locally and meet people working across听different parts听of the industry. People are happy to share what听they鈥檝e听learned and help others find their path.听

Barbara Rosado:听There are many ways to be involved in the energy sector. I naturally speak from an engineering and technical perspective because听that鈥檚听my background, but the industry needs talent from many disciplines.听

For engineers, my advice is simple: master the fundamentals. Study and听truly understand听the basics 鈥� physics, mathematics, core power system principles, equipment, operational procedures, and market rules. We are in the middle of a major transformation, but transformation听builds on听foundations. Once听you鈥檙e听working full-time, it becomes much harder to go back and strengthen those fundamentals if they听were听overlooked.听

I would also encourage getting involved early in extracurricular activities, such as research projects, climate groups, and professional associations like IEEE. These experiences deepen your knowledge, expand your network, and help sustain motivation.听

For those from other backgrounds, the advice is similar: become excellent at what makes you unique. Then actively look for ways to connect your听expertise听鈥� whether in policy, finance, data, or communications 鈥� to the energy sector. The intersection is where听impact听happens.听

A BOOK, PODCAST, OR MENTOR THAT INFLUENCED YOU:听

Leigh Billinghurst:听I鈥檓 a big fan of Mel Robbins. Her 鈥淟et Them鈥� theory really resonated with me. The idea that life is too short to hold onto habits or dynamics that no longer serve you. Her podcast continues to be both insightful and practical, covering everything from personal growth to daily habits and self-care. It鈥檚 a reminder to stay focused on what you can control and keep evolving.听

Kathryn Weber:听听

• Mentors: We have a great People & Culture team, and I feel grateful to learn from and work with Leigh and Shivani.听

• Book: by Gretchen Bakke.听

• Podcasts: The Interchange and Open Circuit.听

The post Grid Modernization Leadership: Perspectives from Women Energy Leaders first appeared on 91影视.

This year, we鈥檙e spotlighting a group of women across 91影视 whose paths into energy look very different, but converge on the same reality: the grid is getting more complex. AI and data centers are impacting demand patterns, adding new complexity to grid planning. Weather volatility and climate change continue to test grid reliability. In that environment, practical solutions matter, and behind-the-meter energy storage is among the most actionable tools available to customers today.

In the conversations below, they share what drew them into the sector, the experiences that shaped how they think about the energy system, and what they鈥檙e paying closest attention to as grid modernization accelerates.

WHAT INITIALLY DREW YOU TO THE ENERGY SECTOR 鈥� AND WHAT HAS KEPT YOU HERE AS THE INDUSTRY EVOLVES?听

Megan Davis:听With a background in environmental science, I was always interested in the more active, systems-level ways we can protect the environment beyond traditional conservation efforts. Sustainable technology has made meaningful strides in addressing environmental challenges, and I knew I wanted to contribute to that progress.听

What really drew me in was how energy technology leverages data science to drive measurable environmental impact. The ability to use analytics and optimization to improve grid performance while reducing emissions felt like a natural intersection of my skills and my values. That alignment ultimately led me to 91影视. I found a place where I could apply my background in a way that feels both technically rigorous and purpose-driven.听

Leigh Billinghurst:听When I first joined 91影视, I was new to the energy industry. It听wasn鈥檛听something I had studied or even seriously considered before. My passion has always been building and scaling startups 鈥� working through the messy stages of growth and creating operating rhythms that align with culture and bring order to chaos.听

As I learned more about the energy system and its impact on the environment, my sense of purpose expanded. I moved from simply wanting to help startups grow to wanting to help those doing meaningful work. That shift grounded my work in something bigger than scale alone.听

I don鈥檛 thrive in static environments, and the energy industry is anything but static. Between climate uncertainty, rising electricity costs, grid resilience challenges, and political volatility, the landscape is constantly complex. There鈥檚 always a problem that hasn鈥檛 been solved yet. That uncertainty 鈥� that dynamic tension 鈥� is exactly where I do my best work.听

Kathryn Weber:听Seeing the impacts of climate change while travelling was a real catalyst for me; it prompted me to learn more about climate solutions. Paging through the book Project Drawdown, I was struck by how many different pathways exist to address climate change, and energy stood out as a powerful lever for impact.听

What鈥檚 kept me in the sector is its dynamism and complexity. Energy can feel almost invisible, 鈥渓ights on, lights off,鈥澨� yet there鈥檚 an incredible amount happening behind the scenes to keep the system reliable and resilient. I鈥檝e stayed engaged because the work constantly expands your perspective on how the grid actually functions and how it needs to evolve.听

A moment that really brought that to life was visiting the control room and seeing the real-time balancing act of supply and demand. It made the challenges tangible: the growing influence of data centers, aging infrastructure constraints, and how programs, policy, and market signals shape development.听

Working within a cleantech company which contributes to climate solutions has been a genuine pleasure.听

Barbara听Rosado:听I was drawn to the energy sector during my undergraduate studies in Electrical Engineering at UNICAMP. In my fourth year, I took courses in optimization and power systems, and I became fascinated by how advanced analytical techniques could be applied to such a large and critical sector. I was curious about how these tools could meaningfully improve real-world infrastructure.听

That curiosity led me to a research project 鈥� what we call a scientific initiation 鈥� which brought me to Canada for a four-month internship at TMU (formerly Ryerson). I was struck by how different, yet similar, the energy challenges were across countries. Working in an academic lab exposed me to a wide range of power system problems and innovative solutions, and I found myself wanting to go deeper.听

I later pursued my MSc and PhD in power systems, focusing on distribution systems, returning听to TMU for extended research stays. Over the past decade,听it鈥檚听been remarkable to see how much the field has evolved 鈥� and even more meaningful to know听I鈥檝e听been part of that progress. What keeps me here is the sense that my knowledge allows me to contribute to that ongoing transformation.听

WAS THERE A DEFINING MOMENT IN YOUR CAREER THAT CHANGED HOW YOU THINK ABOUT THE ENERGY SYSTEM OR YOUR ROLE WITHIN IT?听

Daniela D鈥機osta: Early in my property management career in operations, energy was primarily viewed as an operating expense to control. Over time, as I moved into national program management and worked closely with the sustainability team, I began to see the broader impact. Efficiency improvements weren鈥檛 just about lowering utility bills 鈥� they reduced costs, improved tenant satisfaction, and meaningfully lowered environmental impact all at once.听

That alignment between financial performance and sustainability fundamentally changed how I think about the energy system. I realized that decarbonization doesn鈥檛 have to compete with business objectives; it can actively strengthen them.听

Since then,听I鈥檝e听approached energy management as both a cost strategy and a climate strategy. Commercial and industrial buildings represent a significant opportunity in the energy transition, and I鈥檝e come to see this sector as a critical lever for accelerating meaningful change.听

Jayamali听Kasige:听I graduated as an Electrical Engineer and began my career in power distribution and substation design, although my academic focus had been on power generation. After several years in the field, I realized I wanted to move closer to generation.听

That shift became a defining moment for me. As I explored my next step, it became clear that renewable generation was where I wanted to be 鈥� not only from a technical perspective, but because it aligned with my desire to contribute to environmental progress and clean energy solutions.听

More than a decade ago, I transitioned into the renewable energy sector, focusing on design engineering and renewable operations. Since then, my work has felt more purposeful 鈥� combining technical rigour with long-term impact.听

Leigh Billinghurst:听The defining moment for me was realizing everyone鈥檚 鈥渨hy.鈥� People weren鈥檛 just showing up for a paycheque 鈥� they were here because they genuinely believed this work is good for the planet. That changed how I saw both the company and my role within it.听

In past organizations, when things became uncertain or difficult, the instinct was often to flee. At 91影视, I鈥檝e seen the opposite. We鈥檙e surrounded by brilliant minds who want to make the business work 鈥� who are committed to relieving stress on the grid, partnering with C&I customers to deliver solutions that don鈥檛 disrupt operations, and helping them manage rising energy costs so they can stay focused on their own growth.听

That level of intrinsic commitment reframed my role. My responsibility is to build a culture where that passion can thrive 鈥� one that attracts and develops the best talent in the industry, empowers teams to test new tools, leverages AI, and enables continuous learning in a rapidly evolving sector. People and culture shouldn鈥檛 be seen as red tape. It should be a strategic partner focused on unlocking the full potential of our talent.听

Barbara Rosado:听Yes. There was a defining shift for me, and it was deeply personal.听

During my MSc and PhD, I was extremely hard on myself. The lab environment and the expectations around me often made me feel like I wasn鈥檛 doing enough or pushing hard enough. Over time, that pressure began to shape how I viewed the sector itself, as if there were only one way to belong, and that it required constant intensity and perfection.听

After finishing my PhD and joining 91影视, my perspective changed. I realized there are many different environments within the energy industry 鈥� and听it鈥檚听possible to contribute meaningfully while still being a whole human being. That was transformative.听

Today, I understand that I do belong听in听this space. I can keep learning without knowing everything. I can contribute without burning out. That shift changed not only how I see the industry, but how I see myself within it.听

THE ELECTRICITY GRID IS UNDER INCREASING PRESSURE FROM ELECTRIFICATION AND AI-DRIVEN LOAD GROWTH. WHAT SHIFT DO YOU THINK MORE PEOPLE SHOULD BE PAYING ATTENTION TO?听

Megan Davis:听One shift I think more people should be paying attention to is the pace and impact of AI-driven load growth and electrification. There鈥檚 a lot of discussion suggesting these forces are already the dominant pressures on the grid. While their impacts are becoming more visible, they are not necessarily the most consequential drivers today.听

In many regions, dramatically shifting weather patterns driven by climate change are having a more immediate and disruptive effect on system reliability. Extreme heat, cold snaps, and severe storms are stressing infrastructure in ways that feel increasingly unpredictable.听What concerns me is that some people still perceive these weather dynamics as 鈥渘ormal鈥� variability, when in reality the baseline has shifted.听

If we misdiagnose what鈥檚 driving current strain, we risk misallocating resources. We need to plan for load growth, but we also need to acknowledge that climate volatility is already reshaping grid risk in real time.听

Jayamali听Kasige:听One of the most important shifts is how behind-the-meter energy storage is moving from a niche resource to essential grid infrastructure. As electrification accelerates and AI-driven load growth increases demand, the grid needs more flexibility, and energy storage is becoming central to that reliability.听

At the same time, we are seeing rapid growth in distributed energy resources. This decentralization is fundamentally changing how power flows across the system. The grid is no longer just a one-way delivery model; it is becoming more dynamic and interactive.听

Together, storage and distributed resources are reshaping how we think about planning, operations, and resilience.听This shift deserves more attention because it will define how effectively we manage reliability and sustainability in the years ahead.听

Daniela D鈥機osta: The most important shift happening right now is the transition from a centralized, generation-focused grid to a more distributed and intelligent system. Electrification and AI-driven load growth are accelerating demand, but they鈥檙e also creating an opportunity to leverage data and automation to better orchestrate how and when energy is consumed.听

In my experience, even small operational changes can drive meaningful conservation when applied consistently. At scale, those incremental improvements add up. When you layer in digital controls and analytics, demand becomes something you can actively shape.听

The broader conversation shouldn鈥檛 focus solely on building more generation. It should also prioritize optimizing and coordinating the assets we already have. A more flexible, responsive grid will be just as important as expanding generation resources.听

WHAT EXCITES YOU MOST ABOUT WHERE GRID MODERNIZATION AND BEHIND-THE-METER ENERGY STORAGE ARE HEADED? 听

Barbara Rosado:听What excites me most is seeing ideas that once felt theoretical in academia become reality. During my research, we modeled scenarios with high DER penetration, rooftop solar reshaping load profiles, and distributed resources influencing prices. Today, those scenarios are no longer hypothetical; they are actively shaping markets, depending on the region and regulatory structure.听

It鈥檚听also been fascinating to watch commercial and industrial customers invest more heavily in technology, while data centers introduce entirely new planning challenges for grid operators. The complexity we studied is now unfolding in real time.听

Perhaps the听biggest surprise for me over the past six years has been the transformative power of data. While many academic solutions听relied听on听highly complex听methodologies, in practice, strong data analytics and statistical approaches can generate meaningful insights,听optimize听strategies, and deliver tangible value. More recently, AI agents have accelerated this even further.听

It truly feels like we are only at the beginning. That sense of momentum makes me excited to contribute to what comes next.听

Leigh Billinghurst:听What excites me most is that many customers don鈥檛 yet fully understand the potential of battery energy storage. That both excites and challenges me. The C&I (Commercial and Industrial) sector is already navigating political uncertainty, tariffs, and increased grid stress. For the foreseeable future, batteries will remain one of the most viable and scalable solutions available.听

There are grants and policy mechanisms emerging that prioritize and fast-track storage projects, helping reduce barriers that once slowed adoption. That momentum is important. But what excites me most is when customers experience the impact firsthand.听

Behind the scenes, our teams have invested years building sophisticated products and continuously enhancing how we manage, analyze, and leverage data 鈥� creating real-time and predictive insights that strengthen outcomes. From an employee perspective, it鈥檚 energizing to know that the fruits of that labour will pay off. We鈥檝e long known that behind-the-meter energy storage solutions need to be prioritized. Watching customers and the broader market recognize that value validates the commitment and innovation our teams bring every day.听

Daniela D鈥機osta:听The capability that will define the next generation of grid modernization leaders is the ability to translate complexity into actionable strategy. The grid is evolving rapidly 鈥� with electrification, AI-driven load growth, and distributed energy resource integration reshaping the landscape. The technical dimensions are becoming increasingly sophisticated.听

But modernization听ultimately comes听down to execution. Leaders will need to align financial incentives, operational realities, and sustainability听objectives听in ways that drive measurable outcomes.听

Success will depend on turning high-level sustainability ambitions into practical, operational changes that reduce costs, improve performance, and deliver real impact.听

AT WHAT POINT DOES BEHIND-THE-METER ENERGY STORAGE BECOME ESSENTIAL INFRASTRUCTURE RATHER THAN OPTIMIZATION? 听

Kathryn Weber:听I鈥檇 argue energy storage is already shifting from 鈥渘ice-to-have optimization鈥� to essential infrastructure, and two forces are really driving that.听

First is load growth. We鈥檙e seeing meaningful increases in overall electricity demand, with data centres and electrification (including EV adoption and heat pumps) adding new requirements on the system, often stressing generation resources to meet peak demand.听

Second is the continued growth of听renewable听generation. As solar and wind scale, the grid needs more flexibility to manage intermittency and shifting supply patterns. Storage is key to adding听that flexibility听and strengthening reliability.听

We鈥檙e听seeing real-world examples where storage is becoming a requirement to meet today鈥檚 needs: the听2025 Iberian blackout across Spain and Portugal highlighted how quickly grid disturbances can cascade, underscoring the importance of fast-responding flexibility and resilience in renewable-heavy systems. Energy Storage projects like Lactalis in Ontario are also demonstrating how behind-the-meter energy storage can play a meaningful role during summer peaks. Finally, the volume of storage in听鈥� alongside听s 鈥� reinforces the market’s view that storage is critical for future demand flexibility, reliability, and grid resilience.听

IF YOU COULD CHANGE ONE THING ABOUT THE ENERGY INDUSTRY OVER THE NEXT DECADE, WHAT WOULD IT BE?听

Megan Davis:听Over the next decade, I would push for a deeper and more consistent commitment to truly green energy.听There鈥檚听a common misconception that electrification is automatically sustainable.听In reality, electrification听is only as clean as the energy mix powering the grid.听

Much of today鈥檚 grid is still supported by oil and gas. As load increases, particularly with electrification and digital growth, those sources often听remain听the default because听they鈥檙e听dispatchable and听relatively cost-effective. While they provide reliability, they also lock in emissions if we听don鈥檛听aggressively transition the fuel mix.听

What I鈥檇 like to see is not just policy support for electrification, but also a stronger commitment to decarbonizing the generation that powers it. At the same time, public education matters. Just because a facility doesn鈥檛 have a visible smokestack doesn鈥檛 mean its energy use isn鈥檛 producing emissions somewhere else. A clearer understanding of that system-wide impact is critical to making meaningful progress.听

Daniela D鈥機osta:听If I could change one thing about the energy industry over the next decade, it would be accelerating pathways for women into high-impact, high-growth segments of the sector, particularly in grid modernization, AI integration, distributed energy resources, and capital deployment.听

The coming decade will define the future of the energy system, and women should be shaping it in real time, not entering the conversation after the foundation has already been laid.听

Expanding representation at every level, from technical operations to executive leadership, isn鈥檛 just about equity. It鈥檚 about strengthening the industry itself. A more inclusive energy transition will be more innovative, more resilient, and better reflect the communities it ultimately serves.听

ONE WORD THAT DESCRIBES THE FUTURE OF ENERGY:听

Jayamali听Kasige:听Decentralization.听

Daniela D鈥機osta:听Intelligent. Data-driven at its core.听

The post Behind-the-Meter: 91影视鈥檚 Female Energy Storage Leaders first appeared on 91影视.

TORONTO, ON 鈥� 91影视. has awarded its 2025 Future Leader Bursary to student Azka Siddiqui, underscoring the company鈥檚 belief that human ingenuity remains central to innovation in the clean energy sector, even as artificial intelligence reshapes the industry.

The Future Cleantech Leader Bursary, now in its third year, recognizes STEM students who demonstrate a commitment to sustainability, innovation, and leadership within Canada鈥檚 growing cleantech sector. In 2025, the bursary received 60 applications from students across the country, reflecting growing interest in cleantech-focused careers.

The $1,500 CAD bursary is part of 91影视鈥檚 ongoing effort to support emerging cleantech talent in Canada. This year鈥檚 announcement arrives amid increasing debate about whether AI will displace jobs in technical fields. 91影视 is emphasizing a contrasting reality: the energy transition depends on people who can steer, interpret, and apply advanced technologies鈥攏ot be replaced by them.

Siddiqui, entering her first year of Computer engineering, embodies this next wave of innovators. In her statement, she reflected on the opportunity:

91影视 CEO Derek Lim Soo says the company鈥檚 investment in student innovators reflects the long-term needs of the cleantech ecosystem.

鈥淭he sector is adopting AI at a rapid pace, but technology alone doesn鈥檛 solve climate and energy challenges,鈥� said Lim Soo. 鈥淪olutions come from people who know how to combine engineering, systems thinking, and emerging tools. Students like Azka represent the future of that work. Investing in them strengthens the entire industry.鈥�

About 91影视

91影视 delivers end-to-end battery storage development and energy optimization solutions powered by industry-leading peak forecasting and market intelligence. Working across North America, they help large energy users cut electricity costs, unlock new revenue streams, and pursue sustainability goals. Through strategic investor partnerships and a shared-savings model, 91影视 removes capital cost barriers for customers, offering zero-CapEx battery storage development and operation.

The post Release: 91影视 Awards Bursary to Promising Canadian Cleantech Student first appeared on 91影视.

Published by the CleanAI Initiative, the CleanAI 60 recognizes organizations demonstrating innovation, market traction, climate impact potential, and momentum across sectors including energy, mobility, manufacturing, agriculture, and the built environment.

For 91影视, the recognition reflects years of embedding artificial intelligence to solve practical challenges facing large energy users. As electricity markets become increasingly dynamic, organizations need better tools to anticipate grid demand events, respond to changing market conditions, and maximize the value of distributed energy resources (DERs) and electricity curtailment strategies. 91影视’s software combines advanced forecasting, optimization, and energy market intelligence to help customers make smarter energy decisions that reduce electricity costs, unlock new revenue streams, and support long-term sustainability goals.

“The energy transition is creating new opportunities, but it’s also introducing more complexity for energy users,” said Derek Lim Soo, CEO of 91影视. “We’re embedding AI into our solutions to help customers cut costs, unlock new revenue opportunities, and optimize how energy assets interact with the grid.”

The CleanAI 60 highlights organizations applying artificial intelligence in practical ways to deliver measurable impact. For 91影视, that means giving customers the intelligence they need to optimize battery energy storage systems (BESS) and energy management strategies while helping create a more resilient and reliable electricity grid.

View the complete CleanAI 60 list on the website.

Why AI Matters in Energy Optimization

Artificial intelligence is changing how organizations manage energy, not by replacing human expertise, but by making it possible to respond to an increasingly complex energy landscape with greater speed, accuracy, and confidence.

91影视 applies artificial intelligence across its solutions to help organizations make better energy decisions, whether they have battery energy storage systems or simply want greater control over their energy use.

For customers with battery energy storage, 91影视’s software platform uses AI-enabled forecasting and energy market intelligence to maximize asset performance by determining the optimal times to charge, discharge, and participate in electricity markets.

For organizations without battery storage, GridPredict delivers many of the same forecasting capabilities to help customers strategically manage electricity demand. By accurately predicting peak demand events and providing actionable insights, GridPredict enables facilities teams to proactively curtail energy use, reduce demand charges, and improve operational planning鈥攚ithout requiring additional energy assets.

Together, these solutions give organizations the intelligence they need to respond confidently to changing electricity market conditions. Whether through AI-powered battery optimization or predictive demand management, 91影视 helps customers:

• Reduce electricity costs
• Unlock new revenue opportunities where available
• Improve operational resilience
• Advance sustainability goals
• Make smarter, data-driven energy decisions

These outcomes become increasingly important as electricity markets grow more dynamic and organizations look for practical ways to improve energy performance without increasing operational complexity.

Unlike many AI applications that focus on automation alone, 91影视 applies artificial intelligence where it delivers measurable business value. From forecasting peak demand events with GridPredict to optimizing battery dispatch in real time, Peak’s technology helps customers act on complex market and operational data to improve financial performance and strengthen grid reliability.

Helping Organizations Unlock More Value from Battery Storage

Today’s large commercial and industrial facilities are actively participating in electricity markets, reducing peak demand charges, improving facility resilience, and generating ongoing financial value through their energy strategies.

91影视’s solutions help organizations capture that value by combining predictive forecasting with real-time energy market intelligence. The result is a smarter approach to energy optimization that maximizes financial performance while supporting sustainability objectives and grid reliability.

The post 91影视 Recognized in Inaugural CleanAI 60 for Advancing AI-Driven Energy Optimization first appeared on 91影视.

Ontario鈥檚 electricity system is in the middle of a significant transformation. Rising electrification, volatile demand patterns, and growing participation in demand response programs are making it increasingly difficult to predict when the grid will experience its highest system peaks.听

For decades, the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) has relied on demand forecasting to balance supply and demand, set pricing, and allocate costs such as the Global Adjustment (GA). But in 2025, using IESO鈥檚 forecasts for peak forecasting has become dramatically less reliable.听

For Ontario鈥檚 largest commercial and industrial (C&I) energy users, this matters because the top five coincident peaks determine a huge portion of next year鈥檚 GA costs. Missing just one of those five peaks can cost millions.听

This is where precision in peak forecasting becomes a true competitive advantage.听

Ontario is also shifting toward becoming a double-peaking market, meaning both winter and summer electricity demand will reach similarly high levels. Historically, Ontario has been a summer-peaking system, but by the 2030s demand growth from industrial expansion, data centers, and electrification will make winter peaks just as significant. and is proposing new clean supply resources to meet it. For large energy users, this shift underscores the importance of partnering with a market leader for global adjustment peak forecasting.听

Figure 1: Ontario鈥檚 Net Annual Peak Demand Forecast (2026鈥�2050), Source: IESO,

Why Global Adjustment Cost Matters for Large Energy Users听

The Global Adjustment charge accounts for the costs of building and maintaining Ontario鈥檚 electricity system, including investments in generation and conservation. For C&I facilities with demand greater than 2 MW, participation in the Industrial Conservation Initiative (ICI) allows them to reduce GA costs by curtailing demand during the top five system peaks each year.听

The math is simple:听

• Hit more peaks 鈫� Lower GA costs next year.听
• Miss peaks 鈫� GA costs rise dramatically.听

But the execution is anything but simple. Predicting the exact hours of Ontario鈥檚 top five coincident peaks requires not just weather and load forecasting, but also accounting for how demand response participation and operational shifts across the province are reshaping demand in real time.听

Ontario鈥檚 Market Renewal Program and the Role of Global Adjustment听

Ontario鈥檚 electricity sector is undergoing its Market Renewal Program (MRP), a multi-year effort led by the IESO to improve efficiency and enhance competition in the province鈥檚 wholesale market. While MRP will introduce changes such as a single-schedule market and enhanced day-ahead processes, one constant remains: the Global Adjustment is here to stay. As outlined in our recent article on the Market Renewal Program, the GA charge will continue to represent a major portion of costs for large energy users.听

This is an important reality for Ontario鈥檚 C&I facilities. Even with evolving market structures, GA remains the single largest driver of electricity expenses. That means peak management strategies and accurate forecasting will remain the most effective levers for reducing costs. In other words, while the market around it is modernizing, the incentive to capture top peaks and minimize GA costs is not going anywhere.听

2025: The Most Difficult Year Yet for GA Forecasting听

This year, two unique factors have made peak forecasting more challenging than ever before:听

1. Demand Response Growth:
   Demand response (DR) has grown in participation and impact. On high load days, DR activations can flatten the curve so much that peaks either disappear or shift to new times of day not explained by temperature or grid conditions. The result? No two peak days look alike.听
2. IESO Data Inconsistencies:
   The IESO has acknowledged providing inaccurate load data on certain days without full transparency on when or how it will be remedied. Many market participants and service providers build their forecasts primarily around IESO-provided data. This year, that reliance has led to widespread misses of coincident peak events.听

Together, these factors have made 2025 a year in which听traditional forecasting approaches have struggled, leaving many large facilities frustrated with underperformance.听

Proven Results in a Tough Year听

Despite these challenges, 91影视鈥檚 forecasting has continued to deliver strong, measurable results for Ontario clients.听

• 4 of 5 Top Peaks Accurately Predicted (within a strict 2-hour window)听
• 2 of those were #1-hour predictions 鈥� meaning if facilities only had a single discharge hour, they still would have caught the peak听
• 25 calls were made to achieve this precision 鈥� carefully balancing the need for accuracy with operational efficiency听

Importantly, we don鈥檛 鈥渕ove the goalposts.鈥� Some service providers claim peak hits if they fall within a 3鈥�4 hour window, but we know that鈥檚 not realistic for facilities with 2-hour batteries or limited curtailment windows. Our standard is clear: a forecast is only counted as a hit if the actual peak hour is inside our top two predicted hours of the day.听

听

Why Accuracy Matters to Your Business听

For facilities which are large energy consumers, forecasting accuracy isn鈥檛 just about numbers 鈥� it translates directly into financial performance.听

• Maximized Savings: Every accurately captured peak results in Global Adjustment cost reduction for the following year, often representing millions in avoided costs.听
• Reduced Risk: Narrow 2-hour precision means batteries and curtailment strategies are deployed efficiently, reducing wear-and-tear and unnecessary operational disruption.听
• Operational Certainty: Confidence in forecasts allows energy managers and CFOs to plan with clarity, even in an uncertain grid environment.听

听

What Sets This Forecasting Apart听

While many competitors rely heavily on IESO forecasts and broad performance windows, 91影视 takes a fundamentally different approach.听

• Independent Forecasting: We don鈥檛 rely solely on IESO data, which has proven unreliable this year. Instead, we use multiple proprietary data sets and models to build forecasts that remain resilient even when official data is wrong.听
• Tighter Accuracy Standard: We only count a 鈥渉it鈥� if the peak occurs within our 2-hour prediction window. This matters because it matches the operational reality of facilities with 2-hour batteries or curtailment programs 鈥� giving you a more honest measure of performance.听
• Enhanced Data & Constant Innovation: Our forecasting team integrates enhanced weather models, operational signals, and proprietary analytics. We continually evolve to adapt to Ontario鈥檚 fast-changing market conditions.听

This commitment to independence and precision is why our clients consistently achieve stronger GA reductions compared to facilities that rely on looser or less resilient forecasting methods.听

听

Customer Benefits: What This Means for Your Facility听

If you are a large Ontario energy user with more than 2 MW of peak load, the benefits of precision forecasting translate directly to your bottom line:听

• Lower Global Adjustment Costs: Capture more of the top five peaks and lock in significant year-over-year savings.
• Optimized Asset Use: Batteries, backup generation, or load curtailment programs are deployed strategically 鈥� not wastefully.听
• Competitive Edge: Reduced energy costs improve operating margins and free up capital for reinvestment in core business operations.听
• Peace of Mind: Reliable forecasts mean you can focus on production and growth, not chasing unpredictable system peaks.听

听

Looking Forward: Preparing for an Uncertain Future听

Ontario鈥檚 electricity system is only going to get more complex. Load growth is outpacing new supply, demand response is expanding, and electrification of transportation and industry will reshape load curves in unpredictable ways.听

In this environment, accuracy and adaptability in forecasting will define winners and losers in GA cost management. Facilities that rely on outdated models or broad 3鈥�4 hour windows risk overspending and underperforming.

By contrast, facilities that adopt precision-driven, independent forecasting strategies will not only minimize costs but also position themselves as leaders in sustainability, resilience, and competitiveness.听

听

Take Action for Global Adjustment Cost Reduction

Global Adjustment costs don鈥檛 have to be unpredictable or uncontrollable. With the right forecasting partner, large energy users in Ontario can take control of their GA costs, reduce risk, and unlock measurable financial value 鈥� even in the most challenging years.听

At 91影视, we鈥檙e proud to deliver results that speak for themselves. Precision, adaptability, and customer savings are at the core of everything we do. And as Ontario鈥檚 grid evolves, we鈥檒l continue to innovate to keep our customers ahead of the curve. Or, should we say, ahead of the “load curve.”

Ready to reduce your Global Adjustment costs? Contact us today to book a discovery call.

The post Achieving Precision in GA Forecasting: Maximizing Global Adjustment Cost Reduction in 2025 first appeared on 91影视.

Ontario is entering a new era in energy planning. In June 2025, the province released its Energy for Generations plan, a long-term supply framework to meet growing electricity needs through investments in nuclear refurbishments, new gas and storage facilities, renewables, and transmission infrastructure. The plan reflects Ontario鈥檚 goals of ensuring reliable, affordable, and sustainable power for the future.

For Class A electricity customers, industrial and commercial consumers whose electricity costs are tied to their contribution to system-wide peak demand, these changes mark the end of a short-lived era of subsidy-driven relief. With Global Adjustment (GA) charges poised to rise sharply, Class A customers need to prepare now for a decade of higher costs.

The 2020 Class A Global Adjustment Subsidy: Temporary Relief

Ontario鈥檚 2020 budget temporarily reduced Global Adjustment costs by shifting a portion of the cost burden from electricity users to the provincial tax base. This subsidy created short-term relief for industrial and commercial customers, reducing electricity bills for Class A and Class B customers. However, that program was always temporary. As Ontario transitions into its long-term 鈥淓nergy for Generations鈥� supply plan, Class A customers face rising GA costs again, likely to exceed pre-2021 levels in the coming decade.

Ending the Renewable Cost Shift Program

In 2021, Ontario introduced the Renewable Cost Shift, a program that temporarily moved a large portion of above-market renewable energy contract costs, normally recovered through the GA ,onto the provincial tax base. This was done in response to mounting pressure over high industrial electricity costs.

The Financial Accountability Office (FAO) summarized the subsidy鈥檚 impact:

鈥�$7.2 billion will be provided to reduce electricity bills for industrial ratepayers. Most of these payments ($6.9 billion) will be through the Renewable Cost Shift, which will provide a 14 per cent reduction to a typical industrial ratepayer鈥檚 electricity bill in 2021鈥�22.鈥�
鈥�

This was a meaningful reduction, particularly for Class A customers, defined as large electricity users with peak demand generally over 1 MW (or 500 kW in select sectors). These users are billed based on their consumption during the five system-wide peak demand hours of the year, a structure known as the Industrial Conservation Initiative (ICI).

However, the FAO also cautioned:

鈥淭he discount will decline over time as the subsidized renewable energy contracts expire.鈥�

The newly released Energy for Generations plan confirms that this temporary relief will begin phasing out in 2026. Once that happens, the full costs of legacy renewable contracts will return to electricity bills, placing the burden squarely back on Class A customers.

In other words, the 14% relief enjoyed by Class A customers from 2021 through 2025 will begin coming to an end, and unless new mitigation measures are introduced, GA charges are likely to rise significantly in the coming decade.

New Capacity Procurements Are GA鈥慒unded, Not Market鈥慡ettled

As part of Ontario鈥檚 Energy for Generations plan, Ontario is moving forward with a wide pipeline of new capacity procurements鈥攔anging from gas generation and energy storage to renewable projects and nuclear refurbishments.

Crucially, these projects are not compensated through market-set energy prices. Instead, they are paid through fixed availability contracts, with all associated costs recovered fully via the GA.

This is supported by IESO documentation on settlement processes:

• The explains that for contracted generators, “the contract payments will be recovered through the global adjustment” rather than through real-time energy market transactions.

Adding further clarity, the defines GA as the mechanism that “reconciles differences between payments made to generators at the competitive wholesale market price and payments made at regulated rates or contracts that differ from the wholesale market price.”

The cost of new contracts, like those from long-term RFPs, gas plant upgrades, and nuclear refurbishments, doesn鈥檛 flow through market electricity prices. Instead, they鈥檙e paid through the GA. As more of these contracts are signed, the GA pool will grow, increasing costs for Class A customers who are charged based on their contribution to system peaks.

Rising Peak Demand Will Drive GA Costs Higher

Ontario鈥檚 electricity system is entering a phase of sustained demand growth, driven by electrification, industrial development, and economic expansion. This growth will increase peak demand, the maximum electricity required at any moment on the grid, putting upward pressure, particularly for Class A Global Adjustment costs.

The chart below from the IESO鈥檚 2025 Annual Planning Outlook shows projected net annual peak demand rising from about 24 GW in 2026 to 36 GW by 2050 for summer peaks (a 48% increase) and from 23 GW to 37 GW for winter peaks (a 57% increase) over 25 years.

Figure 1: Ontario鈥檚 Net Annual Peak Demand Forecast (2026鈥�2050), Source: IESO,

This forecasted increase is driven by:

• Electric Vehicle (EV) Battery Plants and Charging Infrastructure: The shift to EVs, including manufacturing and charging, is a major demand driver, expected to contribute 20 TWh by 2035.
• Hyperscale Data Centers: Data centers supporting AI and cloud computing will account for 13% of new electricity demand by 2035.
• Building Electrification and Heat Pumps: Residential and commercial sectors are adopting electric heating, increasing demand.
• Economic Growth in Urban and Industrial Hubs: Areas like Toronto and Windsor are seeing industrial and population growth, boosting electricity needs.

Why This Matters for Class A Global Adjustment

To meet rising peak demand, Ontario must build and maintain:

• New Generation Capacity: This includes gas, storage, and renewables procured through long-term contracts.
• Expanded Transmission and Distribution Infrastructure: To connect new resources and support load growth.
• Refurbished or Extended Nuclear Units: To ensure reliable baseload supply.

As mentioned, all of these projects are funded through fixed-price contracts recovered through GA鈥攏ot the market.

Under the ICI, Class A customers鈥� GA charges are calculated based on their electricity usage during the five highest demand hours of the year. As system peaks increase and more contract costs are added to the GA, customers who cannot accurately predict and manage usage during peak hours will see significantly higher charges.

Nuclear Refurbishment, Pickering Extension, and SMRs: GA Cost Drivers

Ontario鈥檚 electricity reliability plan hinges on a major expansion and renewal of its nuclear fleet. While critical for long-term supply, these projects come with high costs that will be recovered through GA.

For Class A customers, this means larger GA pools and higher exposure to peak-related charges, particularly during the transition to new nuclear capacity.

Figure 1: Nuclear Refurbishment and Retirement Schedule:, Source: IESO,

Bruce and Darlington Refurbishments

Ontario is refurbishing reactors at both Bruce Power and Darlington, with projects exceeding $12 billion at Darlington alone.

These are fixed-price, long-term contracts, meaning ratepayers pay whether or not the power is needed or used. This means costs are embedded in GA, adding billions in fixed recovery costs over the next 10鈥�15 years.

Pickering B Life Extension

The government extended the life of Pickering B (Units 5鈥�8) through 2026. While this is less costly than a full refurbishment, it still adds operational and maintenance costs to the GA pool.

SMRs: New Nuclear for the 2030s

Ontario plans to build four SMRs at Darlington, with the first unit expected online by 2034. These units represent a major capital investment and will also be paid through availability contracts鈥攁dding yet another layer of fixed GA costs starting in the 2030s.

Contracted Gas Capacity: Rising Fixed Costs in the GA

Ontario is increasingly relying on contracted resources to meet growing system needs. Since 2022, the IESO has procured over 1,400 MW of firm capacity through various mechanisms:

• 1,177 MW from the Expedited and Medium-Term RFPs
• 255 MW through Same Technology Upgrades (efficiency gains at existing gas facilities)
• 43 MW from the Brighton Beach natural gas upgrade

These resources are paid based on availability, not dispatch. That means the system pays, via long-term contracts, regardless of how often the resources run. All associated costs are recovered through the GA.

This shift away from market-settled generation is illustrated in the chart below:

Figure 1: Remaining Energy Needs and Future Procurements and Programs Required (2029鈥�2034),

The growing dark blue segments show how a rising share of Ontario鈥檚 energy needs, especially by 2034, will depend on future procurements, all of which will be paid through contract structures that flow through the GA.

Market Renewal Won鈥檛 Solve Global Adjustment Pressures

In May 2025, Ontario launched the Day-Ahead Market as part of its broader Market Renewal Program. These reforms improve how electricity prices are set, increase transparency, and enhance system efficiency.

But market efficiency alone won鈥檛 lower GA costs.

Why? Because the bulk of Ontario鈥檚 electricity still comes from power plants that are paid for through long-term contracts or regulated rates. Even with a more efficient market, the structural cost burden of contracted capacity remains and will continue to grow.

In other words, while the market reforms are useful, they don鈥檛 affect the part of the system where most of the money is spent. The GA will keep going up as Ontario adds more contracted supply to meet future demand.

The Impact of 鈥淓nergy for Generations鈥� on Class A Customers

The bottom line is clear: the phase-out of subsidies, surge in contracted capacity, and sharp demand growth all point to a new era of higher GA costs for Class A customers.

As Ontario brings more capacity online through long-term contracts and continues with large infrastructure projects like nuclear refurbishments, the size of the GA cost pool is expected to grow. Because these costs are fixed and outside the energy market, they are passed on through the GA regardless of how much energy a customer uses overall.

Unless customers can accurately predict and reduce usage during peak hours, they face increasing costs in the years ahead.

Conclusion: Take Action Before the GA Curve Steepens

The Energy for Generations plan signals long-term reliability and sustainability鈥攂ut with real cost consequences for large energy users. With GA costs set to climb starting in 2026, proactive planning is no longer optional鈥攊t鈥檚 essential.

At 91影视, we help Class A customers protect their bottom line through:

• Battery energy storage systems to provide automated load curtailment and respond to grid GA events
• AI-powered peak prediction with GridPredict to to notify you of GA events with precision

Ready to reduce your GA exposure? Contact us today to book a discovery call.

The post What Ontario鈥檚 Energy for Generations Plan Means for Class A Global Adjustment Costs first appeared on 91影视.

Ontario鈥檚 electricity market is gearing up for a big shift on May 1, 2025, with the implementation of the (MRP) changes to the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO)鈥檚 energy market. Through the MRP, the IESO aims to provide greater transparency, competition, and market efficiency. The market is moving from a two-schedule market to a single schedule market (SSM) with the goal of aligning price and dispatch signals and revealing areas that require investment to further support system reliability and ultimately lead to a robust and efficient energy market while aligning with other major ISOs in North American.听听

This shift will impact how dispatchable load and non-dispatchable load (NDL) customers pay for their energy consumption. Below is an overview of the MRP changes that customers will see on their bills.听

Understanding Market Renewal Program: Key Changes and Benefits

Dispatchable loads will see the replacement of real-time, uniform, unconstrained pricing with Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP). The LMP will include:听

• Referencing pricing鈥攖he price of energy at a specific location on the grid based on available supply, known as the 鈥榬eference bus鈥�;听

• Congestion pricing鈥攖he cost of servicing incremental demand in relation to the reference bus (i.e. if energy flows from one location towards the reference bus, congestion pricing will be negative. If the opposite occurs, it will be positive)听

• Loss pricing鈥攖he cost incurred as a result of system losses associated with servicing incremental demand at the applicable reference bus. Loss factors are a function of a resource’s distance from the reference bus and the transmission system flows. Loss pricing will be established on an hourly basis for inclusion in the LMP. The greater the system losses, the lower the LMP.听

NDLs can expect to see replaced with Day-Ahead Ontario Zonal Price (DA-OZP). The DA-OZP will be calculated as the average of all day-ahead LMPs across the applicable load zone, of which there will now be four:听

• Northwest鈥攊ncludes the remaining territories northwest of the Northeast and Southern regions听

• Northeast鈥攊ncludes approximately the regions that fall south of Attawapiskat and Wawa and north of the two Southern regions听

• Southeast鈥攊ncludes the Essa, Ottawa, Toronto and East regions听

• Southwest鈥攊ncludes the Bruce, Niagara, Southwest and West regions听

An NDL will be billed based on their forecasted hourly energy consumption at the applicable DA-OZP rate plus or minus any deviation in their actual consumption at the applicable real-time LMP rate:听

[DA-OZP ($/MWh) x Net Forecasted Load (MWh)] + [RT-LMP ($/MWh) x Net Real-Time Load Deviation (MWh)]听

What This Means for Class A Customers鈥攁nd How 91影视 Can Help听

While we recognize that these changes introduce uncertainty for customers as they try to understand how their energy costs will shift under the new Market Renewal Program (MRP) system, the good news is that 91影视 can help mitigate some of that price concern by helping customers regulate their energy consumption and continuing to provide other cost mitigation services, like Global Adjustment (GA) charge management.听

An energy storage system can help manage energy charges by dispatching when consumption is forecasted to supersede historical forecasted hourly loads to decrease the likelihood that customers will be billed at a higher rate in the real-time market. This is known as non-coincident peak (NCP) management and can be beneficial for customers with volatile load profiles. This allows听our customers to operate with increased energy cost predictability and can be further optimized to capitalize on pricing differences through different operational strategies.听

One thing that will remain the same under the MRP is the GA charge is here to stay. As regional constraints under the new pricing reform become more transparent, there is potential that this will spur energy development and increase GA charges in years to come. New generation capacity can mean greater cost recovery and, ultimately, higher GA charges.

91影视 remains well-positioned to help customers mitigate that charge, as we always have. With our peak forecasting capabilities, 91影视 helps Class A customers manage their Peak Demand Factor (PDF) and decrease their GA charges for the subsequent year.听

Stay Ahead with 91影视听

The IESO鈥檚 MRP will introduce new complexities to our energy charges but 91影视 can help turn it into your advantage. With a proven GA management track record, software, and battery storage, you鈥檙e ready for May 1, 2025, and beyond.

Ready to optimize your energy strategy? Contact us today for a tailored consultation.听

The post Navigating Ontario鈥檚 Market Renewal Program: A Guide for Class A Customers first appeared on 91影视.

What is Demand-Side Management?

Demand side management (DSM)听is an umbrella term referring to a utility-led strategy that optimizes how and when energy is used by consumers. DSM programs use a variety of methods to encourage consumers to use less energy during peak hours or shift their energy use to off-peak times. By encouraging efficiency and flexibility, DSM programs reduce the need for costly upgrades to generation and distribution infrastructure.

DSM programs have a longer time horizon and incentivize efficiency. It encompasses a wide variety of initiatives, such as:

• Equipment and process upgrades
• Load shifting
• Peak shaving
• Demand response (DR), a subset of DSM

Some well-known examples of DSM programs are the and the .

DSM also encompasses initiatives such as retrofits, behaviour change programs, and education to encourage energy-efficient practices among end-users. These programs aim for long-term impact, ensuring that facilities transition to smarter energy use while achieving operational and cost efficiencies.

Demand Response: A Key Component of DSM

In comparison, demand response (DR) is a program subset of DSM. It has a shorter-term outlook and incentivizes flexibility to respond to specific grid events in real-time or near-real-time, stabilizing the grid while earning incentives.

Facilities commit to adjusting their energy consumption in real-time to balance out various stresses on the grid. The aim is to address fluctuations in the grid as they happen, and facilities are rewarded for that energy flexibility. Even if its total energy consumption remains constant year on year, a facility can lower its utility bills by temporarily reducing or shifting its electricity usage in response to grid capacity or pricing spikes. Under some DR programs, facilities can use batteries to automatically curtail their demand on the grid as needed or even monetize their electricity savings by qualifying for expanded incentives.

In our previous post, we examined demand response for industrial facilities and briefly discussed how it differs from demand-side management.

Demand Response (DR):听

• Definition: DR is a specific subset of DSM focused on short-term actions to reduce or shift electricity demand during periods of stress on the grid or market price spikes.听

• Scope: Targeted and event-driven, typically involving real-time or near-real-time adjustments in energy use.听

• Goal: Provide grid flexibility, prevent blackouts, and manage costs during peak demand or grid emergencies.听

• Mechanism:听

• • Signals from utilities or grid operators (e.g., price changes, requests for load reduction).听

• • Participation in DR programs is often incentivized financially.听

• • Enabled by technology like smart meters, building automation systems, and battery storage.听

• Example: A commercial building adjusting temperature or turning off non-essential equipment during a demand response event.听

听

Key Differences:听

How DSM Empowers Large Energy Users Facilities

Facilities with significant energy needs鈥攍ike manufacturers, cold storage facilities, and multi-facility campuses鈥攃an benefit immensely from DSM initiatives. Here are some examples of how DSM works in practice for these sectors:

1. Manufacturing and Processing Plants

• Smart Metering: Real-time energy data helps identify inefficiencies.
• Heat Recovery Systems: Reuse waste heat for industrial processes.
• Battery Storage: Shift grid reliance during peak periods and automate DR participation, reducing costs.
• Advanced Automation: Optimize production schedules to align with off-peak energy hours, saving on costs while maintaining output.

2. Cold Storage and Warehousing

• Efficient HVAC Systems: Reduce the energy intensity of refrigeration and climate control.
• Load Shifting: Leverage battery storage to power equipment during on-peak hours.

3. Steel, Cement, and Industrial Gas Facilities

• Peak Shaving: Smooth out energy peaks to reduce demand charges.
• On-Site Generation: Install renewable systems to lower overall grid dependency.
• Energy-Efficient Upgrades: Retrofit older equipment to modern standards for improved energy performance.

At 91影视, we specialize in developing and optimizing battery storage, solar + storage, and smart EV charger management. These kinds of projects may even qualify for rebates from your local utility or for payments from capacity markets, depending on your region. If you鈥檙e contemplating energy-efficiency projects for your facility, our experts can help you explore local incentives and figure out next steps.

Why Invest in Demand Side Management Initiatives?

1. Stabilizing the Grid

By reducing peak demand and increasing efficiency, DSM ensures a more resilient and reliable electricity grid. For facilities, this means fewer disruptions and a more predictable energy landscape. Facilities with behind-the-meter energy storage solutions and renewable energy systems contribute significantly to this grid stability.

2. Boosting Your Bottom Line

DSM reduces energy costs through efficiency, curtailment, load shifting, and participation in incentive programs. Facilities can monetize their energy flexibility with distributed energy resources (DERs). Additionally, demand-side programs help facilities optimize operational schedules to consume energy at lower tariff times, further reducing costs.

3. Pursuing Net Zero

Another important benefit of DSM is that it helps energy managers achieve their environmental targets. By transitioning to more efficient equipment and processes, as well as reducing energy consumption during peak demand periods, your facility can reduce its Scope 2 emissions.

Why Choose 91影视?

At 91影视, we鈥檙e experts in implementing energy storage solutions tailored to industrial and commercial facilities. Our end-to-end services include:

• Battery Storage Development with our proven 5-step process to get started with energy storage
• Advanced Battery Storage Optimization and Operations Software听for facilities looking to better leverage their existing DERs.
• Coincident Peak Notifications for facilities looking to curtail and reduce costs during peak demand events which spike energy prices

Demand-side management is about building resilience, lowering costs, and preparing for a sustainable future. If you鈥檙e ready to explore how our solutions can transform your facility’s energy operations, 91影视 is here to help. Contact us today to learn more or see if your facility could be eligible for a zero capex energy storage system through a shared savings agreement.

Our market knowledge and expertise can help you get the most out of your energy operations.

The post Beyond Demand Response: Amping Up with Demand Side Management first appeared on 91影视.

While demand response programs were developed to help balance the electrical grid at peak times and avoid blackouts and brownouts, they have many trickle-down benefits for facilities and the greater community. By enrolling in a demand response program, facilities can realize significant bill savings for reducing their energy demand during these periods of peak stress on the grid. In some cases, they can even earn revenue through grid services.

Essentially, demand response programs monetize your facility鈥檚 ability to be flexible with its energy usage. In this blog post, we take a deep dive into the world of demand response programs, how they work, and which programs are available.

Demand response 101: Understanding the basics

Balancing the electrical grid is no small task. The grid is being stretched to the max to meet our insatiable need for energy for everything from cooling and AI to EVs. Add to that the intermittency of renewables, and you have a perfect storm. Demand response programs help utilities meet this demand without relying on fossil fuel-fired peaker plants. What does all this mean for you?

Demand response (DR) is an that maintains grid reliability and security while helping lower electricity prices. At peak times, such as during a heat wave when the need for cooling spikes, demand may surpass a utility鈥檚 generation capacity. In this case, a utility will either be forced to rely on peaker plants or ask demand response participants to lower their demand, mitigating any possible grid issues. And that鈥檚 where your facility can play a key role.

During a DR event, a facility will reduce or eliminate unnecessary energy loads (load shed). However, this isn鈥檛 always possible, and in those cases, load shifting might be a more effective strategy. This refers to shifting when the peak load occurs to reduce the demand costs and balance the grid. There’s also a sophisticated form of load shedding known as , which automatically sheds loads based on pre-programmed policies between the utility and its customers. Often, batteries are used for load shifting and load shedding as they enable a facility to lower peak demand.

When choosing a demand response program, you might come across the term demand-side management (DSM). While they are similar, there are some noteworthy differences. The key distinction is the aim of the program. With DSM, the focus is on reducing energy demand over the long term. This would include things like switching to energy-efficient light bulbs or rebates for customers who purchase ENERGY STAR-certified appliances. Demand response, on the other hand, reduces or shifts demand in response to real-time grid events, helping address fluctuations as they happen.

Why facilities choose to become demand response resources

Participating in a DR program is not only an opportunity to tap into a new revenue stream but also turns energy consumers into prosumers who can play an active role in shaping our energy future. By helping balance the grid, these facilities are contributing to a cleaner tomorrow.

Other benefits of participating in a demand response program:

• Lower energy costs due to curtailing energy usage at peak times
• Generate revenue from your ability to reduce energy consumption during peak times
• 听Contribute to your local community by helping avoid blackouts and brownouts
• Protect operations by preparing your equipment for blackouts when you receive a DR warning
• Reduce emissions by helping utilities avoid peaker plants

There are demand response programs across the US and Canada. While they all have similar benefits, California, Massachusetts, and Ontario have the most favourable markets for generating revenue from demand response. These regions offer a range of demand response programs with robust incentives and support mechanisms that make enrolling in a demand response program worthwhile.听

Making sense of demand response programs

Demand response programs vary greatly from state to state. Things to consider include the rates of payment, required response time, and whether there are any penalties.

A few of the most popular demand response programs include:

• Capacity – These are the most common type of demand response program. It usually has a longer response time than other programs.
• Economic – These demand response events are in response to pricing spikes. The aim is to stabilize the near-term energy price level.
• Ancillary – These are fast-response programs to balance the grid in the event of a power outage, extreme weather events, or insufficient generation.
• Utility – These are utility-level programs that grid operators use to balance the grid. They can be combined with grid-level programs.

Choosing a demand response program that鈥檚 right for you

When choosing a demand response program, there鈥檚 a lot to consider, and the decision can quickly become overwhelming. It鈥檚 important to consider a range of factors, like whether you have specific revenue generation goals and which operations can be temporarily shut down.

Once you鈥檝e made these decisions and have a better idea of what you鈥檙e looking for, it鈥檚 important to explore the different demand response programs. Below, we break down the main demand response programs in California, Massachusetts, and Ontario.

Learn about more energy incentives and programs on our resources page >

Questions to ask before choosing a demand response program

While there are a range of demand response programs out there, the key is to find one that suits your needs and objectives. A good place to start is by asking the right questions. This will help you assess a program鈥檚 suitability.

1. What are the eligibility criteria for participating? Different DR programs are available for different customers, including residential, commercial, industrial, manufacturing, and agricultural. It’s important to check the eligibility requirements of a particular program to see if you qualify.
2. What is the minimum load reduction or participation threshold required? Most demand response programs have a minimum load reduction requirement to ensure participants contribute significantly to grid stability during peak demand.
3. Are there penalties or consequences for non-compliance? Some programs include penalties for failing to reduce electricity demand by the agreed-upon amount.
4. How much control will you have over your energy usage during demand response events? Some programs offer flexibility in how and when you reduce your energy usage, while others may have strict guidelines.
5. 听How might participation in this program impact your day-to-day operations? Reducing energy usage during demand response events can affect your facility鈥檚 productivity, especially if energy-intensive processes are involved.
6. Are there specific technical requirements or equipment needed to participate? Demand response programs may require specific technologies or equipment, such as smart meters or energy management systems, to monitor and manage energy usage during demand response events.
7. What are the financial incentives? Financial incentives are a key motivator for participating in demand response programs. These can include direct payments, bill credits, or reduced energy rates.
8. What is the duration of the program, and what are the terms of commitment? Knowing the duration of the program and the terms of your commitment is important for long-term planning.
9. Are there any regulatory requirements? Some demand response programs may have regulatory implications, especially if they are tied to government policies or incentives.
10. How will integrating a battery affect your facility鈥檚 participation in demand response programs? Integrating a battery will enhance your facility鈥檚 flexibility by enabling you to store energy for peak times, respond quickly to demand signals, and reduce reliance on the grid, thereby increasing your potential savings and program eligibility.

Final thoughts

While the world of demand response programs can be daunting at first, it鈥檚 worth exploring. Because with a little effort, you鈥檙e bound to find a program that suits your facility.

Whatever your objectives, demand response programs are a powerful way to contribute to a stable grid and cleaner energy future, especially when you have the right technology. It鈥檚 truly a win-win. Reach out, and our energy experts will help you find the ideal program for your facility.

If you’re seeking ways to optimize your current energy strategies, talk to us about our end-to-end battery energy storage solution or our peak event notification service.

The post Navigating Demand Response: Find the Right Program for Your Facility first appeared on 91影视.